Using the Intelligent Careers Card Sort with university students. (Effective Techniques). Career Development Quarterly; 3/1/2003; Amundson Norman E.
The authors describe the experiences of university students who completed the Intelligent Careers Card Sort[R] (ICCS) a career exploration exercise that is based on the Intelligent Career framework. The Intelligent Career suggests that there are 3 ways of knowing which individuals should consider to successfully navigate the workplace: knowing-why knowing-how and knowing-whom. This model is discussed in the context of the subjective career and the changing economy and research on card sorts is briefly reviewed. In general students thought that the ICCS was a useful part of the career development groups in which it was administered.
**********
Counselors work in an ever-changing environment that is marked by economic social and cultural shifts. To help clients in their search for personally meaningful careers it is essential for counselors and theorists to develop and test new models that are responsive to these changes (Peavy 1997; Savickas 2000 2001b). In this article we define career as "the evolving sequence of a person's work experiences over time" (Arthur Hall & Lawrence 1989 p. 8); this definition takes into account movement and change within both individuals and their environments. By focusing on individual experience this definition highlights the importance of the subjective view. This is especially relevant in today's service-based postindustrial economy which requires individuals to take greater personal responsibility for their career development (Hall 1996).
The subjective view of career differs from person to person (Betz & Fitzgerald 1987) because it includes an individual's feelings about his or her career accomplishments and expectations for future achievement (Gattiker & Larwood 1986). Career success refers to the attainment of goals that are personally meaningful to the individual rather than the attainment of goals that are set by others (Mirvis & Hall 1994). The objective career conversely is the observed career progress of an individual through an organization or occupation (Collin & Young 1986) and relies on a behaviorally based model of the self a "psychometric self" that will be assessed and given therapy (Peavy 1997).
Career literature that focuses on the objective rather than the subjective career ignores the "perceptions feelings and values of the individuals concerned and the relationship between job and the rest of life" (Collin & Young 1986 p. 841). These individual experiences are precisely those that counselors must attend to in order to create an atmosphere of "mattering" (Amundson 1998) in which an effective client-counselor relationship can be formed.
To understand a client's subjective view the individual meaning and personal experience expressed through anecdotes and stories must be investigated (Collin & Young 1986; Parker 2002; Savickas 1991). Counselors' use of facilitating questions and active listening encourages clients to express their narratives thereby helping individuals enhance their self-knowledge anticipate choices and transitions explore possibilities choose directions that improve fit and develop the self and learn to appreciate their unique value (Amundson 1998; Parker 2002).
The Intelligent Career Framework
Arthur Claman and DeFillippi (1995) have developed a theory of career termed the Intelligent Career which builds on Quinn's (1992) work on the Intelligent Enterprise. This approach comes out of a broader exploration of the boundary-less career model (Arthur & Rousseau 1996) which is based on the recognition that contemporary careers are not restricted to one employer or even to one occupation.
Boundaryless organizations are those that emerged in response to the globalization of the economy and the movement to information-driven service-based business (Arthur 1994; Mirvis & Hall 1994). A boundaryless career by extension is marked by a variety of tasks that may or may not be easily transferred into a job title entails a periodic redefinition of profession and often includes several career and job changes over the course of a lifetime (Arthur 1994).
The Intelligent Career is based on three subjective ways of knowing that reflect the development of important areas of one's life. These are (a) knowing-why (b) knowing-how and (c) knowing-whom. Knowing-why refers to meaning to one's personal beliefs and values and to the sources of motivation for a certain career path (Arthur et al. 1995; DeFillippi & Arthur 1994). Knowing-how pertains to the technical skills and knowledge a person brings to his or her career and to a company (Arthur et al. 1995; DeFillippi & Arthur 1994). Knowing-whom involves the interpersonal connections that link people to employment opportunities and to developments within their field (DeFillippi & Arthur 1994).
The Intelligent Career provides in two ways a uniquely holistic view an essential characteristic for effective career counseling (Savickas 1996). First the theory emphasizes three interdependent yet conceptually separate competencies. Second the theory allows work to be considered from a subjective point of view in the overall pattern of people's lives not as separate from it (Parker 2000).
Using Card Sorts to Elicit the Subjective Career
A variety of career counseling tools have been developed to elicit individual meaning. These include writing and drawing exercises guided imagery and card sorts but research on their effectiveness is lacking.
Some research has been conducted on vocational card sorts typically consisting of approximately 100 three-by-five-inch cards on which occupational titles are printed. The cards are sorted into categories such as "would not choose" "would choose" and "undecided"; the reasons for making the choices are also considered. It has been demonstrated that card sorts have many positive features that make them useful career counseling tools (Goldman 1982 1983; Slaney & Mackinnon-Slaney 1990).
First the card sort process can be seen as a structured interview technique that focuses on a client's reasons for making his or her career choices (Goldman 1983); the card sorts give clients the freedom to choose from a number of different options while at the same time providing an organizing framework. Second card sorts demand a client's active participation. Third results are generated immediately and the absence of technology removes the mystery from career decision making (Goldman 1982). Fourth card sorts require counselors to become involved in the process in a subjectively oriented manner (Slaney & Mackinnon-Slaney 1990). Finally they are appropriate for a wide range of clients. Cognitively complex clients such as university students benefit from the opportunity to organize their ideas and to engage in individual thinking (Slaney & Mackinnon-Slaney 1990).
In general researchers have suggested that card sorts are effective interventions that compare favorably with other widely used standardized instruments (Slaney & Mackinnon-Slaney 1990). However because most studies have used self-administered sorts that did not require counselor intervention there was a need to investigate counselor-administered card sorts.
Intelligent Careers Card Sort (ICCS)
Using the concepts of the Intelligent Career model (Arthur et al. 1995) the ICCS was specifically developed to elicit an individual's views regarding his or her desired career; the information is gathered through a process that engages client and counselor in a dynamic constructive dialogue. It is composed of 112 cards that are subdivided into three color-coded sections (blue yellow and green) of up to 40 cards each of which represents three ways of knowing: knowing-why (blue cards) knowing-how (yellow cards) and knowing-whom (green cards). The sort was developed through a research project conducted by Parker (1996) and is currently undergoing field testing.
The ICCS contains statements that are sorted into piles on the basis of whether or not the statement reflects current career behavior and beliefs. The knowing-why cards reflect personality traits values personal and family situations and the influence of past and present work experiences. The knowing-how cards explore the steps the individual is taking to gain technical/professional skill and expertise. The knowing-whom cards describe friendship support systems relationships with mentors and personal networks as they affect work relationships.
The process is identical for each of the three sets of cards as described by Parker (2002). The client begins with one set of cards and quickly sorts them into two piles according to their immediate subjective appeal: "This applies to me" or "This doesn't apply to me." The applicable cards are then divided into two piles: "These are more important" and "these are less important." From the "more important" cards the client selects seven and places those in rank order.
The next step is for the counselor to enter the client's choices into a software program and generate a printout (Parker 2002). However for our study the participants were supplied with a photocopied package in which they noted their choices and comments. Having knowledge of the client's choices provides the basis for a discussion between the client and counselor if the TOGS is administered individually or between group members if it is administered in a group setting (Arthur & Parker 1997). The purpose of this dialogue is for clients to better understand what their card choices mean how past experiences have led them to choose their seven cards and how the meanings they ascribe to those cards might influence present and future career choices (Parker 2002). The counselor's role is to facilitate the process by inquiring about the client's choices.
The ICCS is used in an open-ended manner that reveals individuals' unique experiences and thus different clients may interpret the same card statement in different ways. For example one knowing-why cards states "I like to fulfill personal goals at work." For one client this goal may be to achieve a leadership position whereas for another client it may be to produce consistently high-quality work. This underscores the importance of counselor involvement.
Parker (2000) in her research on the ICCS received positive feedback on a number of the features of the card sort. People with a kinesthetic learning style appreciated the tactile aspect of physically working with the cards. Participants also reported that they found the card sort process more interesting than writing a career history or keeping a diary because it provided a guideline for developing personal narratives without imposing objective criteria.
Career Development of Postsecondary Students
Although economic changes affect all job seekers they especially affect university and college students (Borgen Hatch & Amundson 1990; Rayman 1992) who are just beginning to develop a career identity and venture into the world of work. Many students face their graduations with trepidation lacking a career goal and the skills needed for navigating a world that is very different from that of higher education (Borgen et al. 1990; Buckham 1998; Lewallen 1993; Luzzo McWhirter & Hutcheson 1997; Orndorff & Herr 1996; Rayman 1992).
The senior undergraduate students interviewed by Buckham (1998) lamented their lack of understanding about "the real world" of work and recognized that they needed deeper levels of knowledge and understanding about changing labor markets. Similarly Orndorff and Herr (1996) found that undergraduates lacked the skills and knowledge needed to make an informed occupational choice. Furthermore in his study Lewallen (1993) found that being undecided about a career was the norm rather than the exception among college students.
In a study that underscored the negative effects of unemployment on university graduates Borgen et al. (1990) found fluctuations in emotion an "emotional roller coaster" and a reduction in self-confidence suggesting that college and university counselors can help prospective graduates by discussing the environmental factors that may pose a challenge to the smooth career entry that was once assumed to be the norm for college graduates.
The purpose of this study was to explore through focus group interviews the experiences of university students who completed the ICCS. It was expected that students would be able to describe how and why the process was or was not useful to them in clarifying their vocational interests and in increasing their levels of self-understanding.
Method
Setting and Participants
The 28 participants were students at the University of British Columbia (UBC). UBC is located in Vancouver British Columbia and has an enrollment of approximately 35000 students. The age range of participants was 17-53 years with a median age of 26 years. There were 22 women and 6 men in the sample; 20 were undergraduates and 8 were graduate students. The sample contained 25 full-time students 1 part-time student and 2 alumni. Caucasian Asian and Southeast Asian students participated; however statistics regarding ethnic and cultural background were not collected. Of the 28 students who completed the ICCS 20 were present at the focus group interviews resulting in interview groups that consisted of 2 to 5 participants.
Students were recruited through the five-session career development groups offered at UBC's Counselling Services. These groups consist of a maximum of 8 participants and are scheduled over 5 weekly 2-hour sessions. Career development groups follow a psychoeducational format that includes a variety of exercises that are designed to explore and clarify interests values skills and decision-making abilities. For example the Strong Interest Inventory (Hansen & Campbell 1985) and Keirsey-Bates Temperament Sorter (Keirsey & Bates 1978) are administered and interpreted during group sessions.
Procedure
The research was undertaken in six career development groups that were facilitated during the fall 2000 semester and was conducted in two phases. During Phase 1 the ICCS was administered during the 2nd hour of each of the first career development group sessions. Phase 2 took place in the last session of each group at which time students participated in 30-minute audiotaped focus group interviews. Field notes were taken during card sort administrations and focus group interviews and were compared with transcripts for consistency and to begin developing themes.
Results and Discussion
Thematic Categories
Because the purpose of this study was to uncover the positive and negative factors of the ICCS thematic categories were assigned to a positive or negative column by the first author who used the focus group data analysis procedure described by Vaughn Schumm and Sinagub (1996). Briefly this method involves transcribing recorded interviews and identifying thematic units of data. The first author analyzed transcripts across groups and sorted data units into themes on the basis of the following research question: What were the positive and negative factors of the ICCS as experienced by university students? The second author reviewed and further refined the categories and a graduate student in counseling psychology re-sorted the data units; interrater reliability was 92%.
To make the data clearer and more understandable the categories were divided (during the development of the procedure) into subcategories that indicate the types of statements participants made. The criteria for each category and subcategory were finalized once data units were sorted into groups. Table 1 shows the number of data units per category and the titles and subtitles of thematic categories. For example the category of "Wording" refers specifically to the language on card sort items whereas the subcategory "liked use of first person" refers to this aspect of the item's language.
In interpreting the results from this study it is important to keep in mind the preliminary nature of the research. The focus was primarily exploratory and the results should be interpreted accordingly.
Participant Feedback
The majority of statements about the ICCS indicated that students found it to be useful. Interpreting the focus group feedback must begin by acknowledging the strong positive reaction to the overall ICCS process. Comments such as the following reflect this general positive experience: "I really liked the card sort ... I found out quite a bit about myself from just that class." Another student explained that by doing the card sort "I learned things about myself that sometimes you don't realize or you don't think about."
Certain key aspects of the ICCS experience seemed to account for these positive results. Students found the division of the ICCS into three competency categories effective: "It is helpful to have the different colors. ... It provides a kind of a shift." They also commented that the competencies provided a comprehensive way of looking at career: "I think they were all helpful. 'Why' 'how' and 'whom' were important." This feedback lends support to the notion that the Intelligent Careers model provides a holistic perspective of career (Parker 2000).
Regarding the cards themselves participants viewed the knowing-why cards as particularly helpful. A comment such as the following illustrates this positive reaction: "I thought that the blue ones were the most helpful because they helped me really specify what my values were." Values have been recognized as a vital subject to explore with clients in career counseling (Lebo Harrington & Tillman 1995; Slaney & Mackinnon-Slaney 1990; Super 1992; Super & Sverko 1995; Vondracek 1995; Zytowski 1994) and these results confirm this view.
Finally the participant package received positive support. The following comment was typical: "I found the process of writing out the reflection on the choices to be helpful." Students reported that it was useful to have a permanent record of their results that they could refer to in the future.
Having outlined the positive aspects of the experience it is also important to identify aspects of the experience that were viewed from a more negative perspective. Criticism about the cards themselves focused on two areas. First students expressed concern about the similar wording used on some of the cards. One student reported "One of the initial things that I was feeling when doing it was that it was very difficult to discriminate between some of the cards."
Second the set of cards receiving the most negative reaction were those dealing with the knowing-whom domain. These cards seemed to reflect a mercenary element for some students. Comments such as the following illustrate this reaction: "Just with the green I felt selfish almost like you're using people." Another participant lamented her lack of work experience which made sorting the knowing-whom cards difficult: "The one that I thought was the most difficult was the green one because I really hadn't worked that much." Parker (1996) also found that individuals had trouble with this category. The area of relationship building in terms of career development is relatively underdeveloped and few traditional exercises help clients explore this domain.
Despite some of their difficulties with the card sort process many participants stated that they preferred the ICCS to other activities used in the career development group which is an important finding in light of the fact that this was the first time the ICCS was used in this setting.
Enhancing the Effectiveness of the ICCS
Based on participants' statements some recommendations can be made for enhancing card sort administration. As Gray-Vickrey (1993) noted the creative synergy of focus groups often leads to the generation of new ideas by participants.
The first and perhaps most important way to enhance the administration process is to ensure that individuals have sufficient time to complete the card sort process. Participants valued interaction with fellow group members and would have appreciated as one student said "more time to reflect upon it immediately after so that we get a chance to go through why we chose some of those that we did and have dialogue about that." With adequate time participants might also be able to distinguish the subtle differences between items and thus develop a better understanding of the three ways of knowing. Several students suggested that 1 1/2-2 hours would be appropriate. Because the ICCS was used within an existing program the time that was allocated for this activity was limited. The negative impact of the externally imposed time constraints illustrates the importance of the person-centered subjective view of career which prioritizes the client's needs in developing maximally effective interventions (Collin & You ng 1986; Parker 2002).
A second way to improve administration might be to use the Intelligent Career model as an organizing framework (Parker 2002). Other career exploration activities can be linked to this framework and discussed with clients. For example values exploration exercises fall within the domain of knowing-why; informational interviewing is an example of knowing-whom. To help clients better understand the Intelligent Career framework it would be valuable for counselors to explain in some detail the meaning of the three ways of knowing. Providing more information might also help to strengthen the educational nature of the ICCS which several students reported that they appreciated.
Finally the Intelligent Career model can be used in tandem with other career counseling principles such as the constructivist framework proposed by Savickas (2001b). Savickas (1995) suggested that counselors work to understand clients' personality types vocational concerns and career narratives specifically focusing on eliciting stories that reveal the client's life theme. The ICCS which requires counselors to interact with clients to explore the meaning of items the clients choose is of great value in this task.
Directions for Future Theory and Research
Because this was the first study to explore the use of the ICCS with university students it is important for research to be conducted on other university campuses and with larger samples. Another useful direction might be to explore the card sort choices made by different populations. The Intelligent Careers framework is an example of the innovative concepts that can result from bridging two traditionally distinct areas: career counseling and organizational behavior. As Savickas (2001a) explained such unions should be encouraged because they stimulate the development of models and methods that conceptualize changing ways of working and living.
The ICCS exercise encourages both client and counselor to become actively engaged in a mutually creative discussion that is both enjoyable and productive. Further exploration of the active engagement (Amundson 1998) nature of the ICCS might be a fruitful direction for research.
Using qualitative methodologies as shown in this article and recommended by others (Borgen & Amundson 1990; Savickas 2001a) would help to illustrate the complexity of the career exploration and decision-making process and broaden the scope of research topics.
Conclusion
The ICCS is valuable to career practitioners clients and researchers as frequent economic change becomes the norm. The process provides a holistic view of career through its framework of the three ways of knowing that the Intelligent Career model offers. The positive results of the research conducted thus far have shown the ICCS to have applicability to a range of client populations and that potential difficulties can be prevented through appropriate planning and administration. By connecting client and counselor in an enjoyable and personalized process the ICCS illustrates the power of active engagement (Amundson 1998) in helping individuals better understand themselves and the new world of work.
TABLE 1
Number of Data Units per Thematic Category for Features of the Intelligent Careers Card Sort[R] (ICCS)
Category Title and Subtitle Positive Negative
Overall process 36 9 General positive comments 12 Liked the choices 1 Results were useful 2 Prioritizing cards was useful 5 Learned new things about self or workplace 16 Not enough choices 2 Large number of cards made prioritizing difficult 7 Timing of administration 7 6 Good to have in first session 7 Better to do in a later session 6 Wording 5 23 Liked use of first person 2 Liked words in context 2 Liked business language 1 Item not useful 1 Similar wording confusing 17 Business language difficult 5 Opinions about the competency categories 29 15 Division of sort into three categories useful 7 Liked the blue (knowing-why) 16 Liked the yellow (knowing-how) 2 Liked the green (knowing-whom) 4 Didn't like the blue (knowing-why) 1 Didn't like the yellow (knowing-how) 1 Didn't like the green (knowing-whom) 13 Participant package 11 1 Questions in package useful 4 Writing results and comments useful 7 Questions not useful 1 Comparisons with other group exercises 11 7 Preferred ICCS 11 Preferred other exercises 7 References
Amundson N. E. (1998). Active engagement: Enhancing the career counselling process. Richmond British Columbia Canada: Ergon Communications.
Arthur M. B. (1994). The boundaryless career: A new perspective for organizational inquiry. Journal of Organizational Behavior 15 295-306.
Arthur M. B. Claman P. H. & DeFillippi R. H. (1995). Intelligent enterprise intelligent career. Academy of Management Executive 9 1-15.
Arthur M. B. Hall D. T. & Lawrence B. S. (1989). Generating new directions in career theory: The case for a transdisciplinary approach. In Michael B. Arthur Douglas T. Hall & Barbara S. Lawrence (Eds.) Handbook of career theory (pp. 7-25). Cambridge United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Arthur M. B. & Parker P. (1997). The Intelligent Careers Card Sort [TM] exercise: A brief guide for licensed practitioners. Unpublished manuscript.
Arthyr M. B. & Rousseau D. M. (Eds.). (1996). The boundaryless career: A new employment principle for a new organizational era. New York: Oxford University Press.
Betz N. & Fitzgerald L. (1987). Career psychology of women. San Diego CA: Academic Press.
Borgen W. A. & Amundson N. E. (1990). New challenges for career development: Methodological implications. In R. A. Young & W. A. Borgen (Eds.) Methodological approaches to the study of career (pp. 185-196). New York: Praeger.
Borgen W. A. Hatch W E. & Amundson N. (1990). The experience of unemployment for university graduates: An exploratory study. Journal of Employment Counseling 27 104-112.
Buckham L. (1998). 'Perhaps we're thinking there isn't a career out there for us': A study of undergraduates' attitudes to their fixture prospects. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling 26 417-433.
Collin A. & Young R. A. (1986). New directions for theories of career. Human Relations 9 837-853.
DeFillippi R. J. & Arthur M. B. (1994). The boundaryless career: A competency-based perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior 15 307-324.
Gattiker U. & Larwood L. (1986). Subjective career success: A study of managers and support personnel. Journal of Business and Psychology 1 78-94.
Goldman L. (1982). Assessment in counseling: A better way. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance 15 70-73.
Goldman L. (1983). Measurement forum: The vocational card sort techniqueA different view. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance 16 107-109.
Gray-Vickrey P. (1993). Gerontological research: Use and application of focus groups. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 19 21-27.
Hall D. T. (1996). The career is dead: Long live the career. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hansen J. C. & Campbell D. C (1985). Manual for the Strong Interest Inventory (4th ed.). Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.
Keirsey D. W. & Bares M. (1978). Please understand me: Character and temperament types. Del Mar CA: Prometheus Nemesis.
Lebo R. B. Harrington T. F. & Tillman R. (1995). Work values similarities among students from six countries. The Career Development Quarterly 43 350-362.
Lewallen W. (1993). The impact of being 'undecided' on college-student persistence. Journal of College Student Development 34 103-112.
Luzzo D. A. McWhirter E. H. & Hutcheson K. G. (1997). Evaluating career decision-making factors associated with employment among first-year college students. Journal of College Student Development 38 166-171.
Mirvis P. H. & Hall D. T. (1994). Psychological success and the boundaryless career. Journal of Organizational Behavior 15 365-380.
Orndorff R. M. & Herr E. L. (1996). A comparative study of declared and undeclared college students on career uncertainty and involvement in career development activities. Journal of Counseling & Development 74 632-640.
Parker H. L. P. (1996). The new career paradigm: An exploration of 'intelligent career' behaviour among MBA graduates and students. Unpublished master's thesis University of Auckland New Zealand.
Parker P. (2000). Career communities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation University of Auckland New Zealand.
Parker P. (2002). Working with the intelligent career model. Journal of Employment Counseling 39 83-96.
Peavy R. V. (1997). A constructive framework for career counseling. In T. L. Sexton & B. L. Griffen (Eds.) Constructivist thinking in counseling practice research and training (pp. 122-140). New York: Teachers College Press.
Quinn J. B. (1992). Intelligent enterprise: A knowledge and service based paradigm for industry. New York: Free Press.
Rayman J. R. (1992). Contemporary career services: Theory defines practice. In Jack R. Rayman (Ed.) The changing role of career services (pp. 3-22). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Savickas M. L. (1991). The meaning of work and love: Career issues and interventions. The Career Development Quarterly 39 315-324.
Savickas M. L. (1995). Constructivist career counseling for career indecision The Career Development Quarterly 43 363-373.
Savickas M. L. (1996). A framework for linking career theory and practice. In M. L. Savickas & W. B. Walsh (Eds.) Handbook of career counseling theory and practice (pp. 3-25). Palo Alto CA: Davies-Black.
Savickas M. L. (2000). Renovating the psychology of careers for the twenty-first century. In A. Collin & R. A. Young (Eds.) The future of career (pp. 53-68). Cambridge United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
Savickas M. L. (2001a). The next decade in vocational psychology; Mission and objectives. Journal of Vocational Behavior 59 284-290.
Savickas M. L. (200lb). Toward a comprehensive theory of career development: Dispositions concerns and narratives. IN F.T.L. Leong & A. Barak (Eds.) Contemporary models in vocational psycholagy (pp. 295-320). Mahwah NJ: Erlbaum.
Slaney R. B. & Mackinnon-Slaney F. (1990). The use of vocational card sorts in career counseling. In E. C. Watkins & V. Campbell (Eds.) Testing in counseling practice (pp. 317-371). Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
Super D. E. (1992). Toward a comprehensive theory of career development. In D. H. Montross & C. J. Shinkman (Eds.) Career development: Theory and practice (pp. 35-64). Springfield IL: Thomas.
Super D. E. & Sverko B. (Eds.). (1995). Life roles values and careers: International findings of the Work Importance Study. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Vaughn S. Schumm J. S. & Sinagub J. (1996). Focus group interviews in education and psychology. Thousand Oaks GA: Sage.
Vondracek F. W. (1995). Vocational identity across the life-span: A developmental contextual perspective on achieving self-realization through vocational careers. Man and Work 6 85-93.
Zytowski D. G. G. 1994). A Super contribution to vocational theory: Work values. The Career Development Quarterly 43 25-31.
Susan M. Wnuk Ontario Institute for Studies in Education of the University of Toronto; Norman E. Amundson Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology and Special Education University of British Columbia. Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Susan M. Wnuk 2015-666 Spadina Avenue Toronto ON M5S 2H8 Canada (e-mail: swnuk@oise.utoronto.ca).
COPYRIGHT 2003 National Career Development Association
This material is published under license from the publisher through the Gale Group Farmington Hills Michigan. All inquiries regarding rights should be directed to the Gale Group.
HighBeam™ Research Inc. ⓒ Copyright 2006. All rights reserved.
|